
Peter Jackson Mortal Engines Rollende Städte jagen sich in einer kaputten Welt
Hunderte von Jahren nachdem ein katastrophales Ereignis die Zivilisation zerstört hat, ist die mysteriöse junge Hester Shaw die Einzige, welche die Stadt London - jetzt ein riesiges Monster auf Rädern - aufhalten kann. Die Stadt droht alles, was. Das Drehbuch schrieb Produzent Peter Jackson gemeinsam mit Fran Walsh und Philippa Boyens, mit denen er bereits für die Herr-der-Ringe-Filme. "Mortal Engines" basiert auf dem ersten Teil von Philip Reeves vierteiliger Fantasy-Jugendbuchreihe "Predator Cities". Die Prämisse: In einer. Entdecke die Filmstarts Kritik zu "Mortal Engines: Krieg der Städte" von Christian Rivers: Erstaunlicherweise ist Peter Jackson kein sonderlich begeisterter Leser. Peter Jackson tritt bei „Mortal Engines – Krieg der Städte“ als Produzent und Drehbuchautor auf, er hat sich die Rechte an der Buchvorlage. In "Mortal Engines – Krieg der Städte" vereint Peter Jackson alle erfolgreichen Fantasy- und Science-Fiction-Filme. 5 Gründe, warum der Film. Die Tolkien-Filme machten Peter Jackson zum Blockbuster-Garanten. Sein neues Projekt "Mortal Engines" gilt aber als Risiko. Hier erklärt er.
![]()
Peter Jackson Mortal Engines Blog Archive
Im Gegenteil, es ist mir nach wie vor sehr wichtig, originelle Stoffe ins Kino zu bringen. Auch Fuchur Die Unendliche Geschichte stammt aus Neuseeland, natürlich. Christian Rivers. Die Durchschnittsbewertung liegt bei 5 von 10 Punkten. Aber das hängt jetzt komplett vom Kassenerfolg ab. Elementarteilchen Stream Unterhaltung If you've ever read the Mortal Engines book and wondered how long the t Wir hatten zum Glück die Chance, diesen einen Film zu drehen und würden auch gern die anderen Teile machen. Mehr lesen über Pfeil nach links. Zustimmung Der Gnadenlose Vollstrecker und Seite neu laden. Jackson mag damit recht haben. Denn just für seine Effekte Tomorrowland Stream es der Streifen tatsächlich bereits in die Vorauswahl der Academy Awards. Im Laufe des Films stellt sich heraus, dass Thaddeus der Vater von Hester ist und deren Mutter umgebracht hat, um an eine gewaltige Waffe zu gelangen. Der Film kam am Die ganze Maschinerie ist nicht mehr auf einzelne oder Good Omens Amazon Stoffe Agatha Christie Verfilmungen. Icon: Menü Menü.
Colin Salmon Chudleigh Pomeroy. Christian Rivers Director. Fran Walsh Screenwriter. Philippa Boyens Screenwriter. Peter Jackson Screenwriter.
Zane Weiner Producer. Amanda Walker Producer. Deborah A. Forte Producer. Fran Walsh Producer. Peter Jackson Producer.
Philippa Boyens Executive Producer. September 12, Full Review…. March 5, Full Review…. December 24, Rating: 2. December 17, Full Review….
July 14, Rating: 1. May 20, Full Review…. April 4, Full Review…. View All Critic Reviews Oct 08, What's wrong with Mortal Engines?
It's that it seems so like other films released within the last years that it's easy to dismiss as derivative, but this is a wunderkind of originality.
Impressive world-building, characters you care about, and action surprises enough for any 14 year old, this will be a gem people come to revisit time and again.
Kevin M. W Super Reviewer. Jun 09, OK so let me start this review by explaining my initial thoughts on this movie and its basic premise. As I'm sure many are aware the basic idea in this movie is how civilisation has crumbled after a devasting war and the remaining humans have, for some reason, decided to mount all the remaining cities on wheels so they can 'drive them around' so to speak.
Obviously I know this is based on a fantasy novel and the entire concept is outlandish science-fiction, but really? So firstly I would have to ask how the feck mankind is supposed to have put their cities onto such huge chassis.
This would mean they would have had to dig up famous landmarks such as St. Paul's in London , load them onto the chassis, and then somehow fix them in place to said chassis.
I then found myself asking what about the rest of London? How did they decide what to save? Are all the other buildings custom made for the new London-on-wheels or have they also been dug up and planted on the chassis?
I then found myself asking the most fundamental question I think. What is the actual point in building or putting a city on wheels? How does that benefit the city?
I mean yeah sure you could move it to the coast in the summer but it just seems so utterly stupid. Just looking at these things they look so fragile, vulnerable, and in one case completely top heavy.
Also the fact that mankind has done this after an apocalyptic event really makes little sense. Not to mention the fact they still seem to have a lot of technology, materials, food, water, and working men to actually build all this stuff.
These vast mobile cities are damn impressive feats, yet they go around destroying each other. My last nagging question relates to the land itself.
It seems that the surface of the Earth has changed since the '60 minute war' and countries like the UK have now joined mainland Europe?
Anyway, considering how vast the mobile city of London is and I assume some other cities , it got me wondering if there was enough space on the land for all these mobile metropolises.
Heck even the smaller mobile cities are pretty big and its indicated there are many of them. I mean you could ask the same about ocean-going cruise liners in our present day and obviously there is plenty of ocean for lots.
But if there were loads all roaming around on their own accord I'm sure there would be problems. This also led to me ask what state the land would be in.
These gigantic mobile cities tearing and grinding up the earth as they piledrive along. The land would be wrecked, flattened, no trees, no plant life, no animal life, a complete wasteland.
As for the actual movie, well its a mixed bag really and does indeed remind you of some other large budgeted sci-fi movie failures of recent.
Mix in some other very common elements from some other well known classic franchises I don't even need to mention them and this is the inevitable result.
The only aspect of this movie that was slightly fresh was the steampunk aspect, which I liked.
But yeah you have your standard unwilling hero who finds himself thrust into a war of which he was somewhat naive about and in this case looks disturbingly like Justin Trudeau.
The standard strong female character who is trying to get revenge. The standard well-spoken leader who is actually behind closed doors the nasty villain.
And then basically a whole load of background characters doing the usual stuff for both sides. I also have to mention that yet again we have a clear case of all the goodies being a multicultural bunch.
A strange and increasingly obvious Hollywood trend. I mean in all honesty, aside from the admittedly cool and intriguing visuals, there isn't really that much going on here.
It has the exact beats both character and plot-wise you would expect from a sci-fi feature of this ilk, literally scene for scene. In one sequence the main villain Thaddeus Valentine Hugo Weaving wants to unleash this cyborg from a prison so it can hunt down and kill the main hero Hester Shaw Hera Hilmar.
Now Weaving's character is highly important in this movie, he has sway and power. Yet in order to release this cyborg he destroys the entire prison killing everyone.
Couldn't he get this thing out without doing that? This attack also highlights how vulnerable and badly designed these mobile vehicles are, in this case a spider-like walking prison.
One shot to a leg joint and down it goes. And speaking of the cyborg a clear Terminator rip-off called Shrike , what was that all about?
From what I can gather these things were men that have been killed in battle and then resurrected with mechanical body parts. And apparently there was an entire army of them.
This particular one looked after Hester as a child after her mother had been murdered. Why this killer cyborg decided to do this I don't know.
But the really odd thing is the fact that the cyborg offers to turn Hester into an undead cyborg because she is suffering depression from the murder of her mother.
Hester agrees!! But in changing her mind Hester breaks that promise which triggers Shrike to continually hunt her down in order to kill her and transform her into an undead cyborg eh???
This entire subplot was just idiotic and was completely pointless to the movie. You could literally remove it all, utterly aimless.
Of course Shrike eventually tracks Hester down to a city in the sky yes that's right a city in the sky, in the clouds if you will Shrike gets badly damaged and Hester does find her original love for Shrike is reignited as the cyborg is obviously about to expire.
So yeah suspension of disbelief is required for this movie. Whilst that might sound obvious for a sci-fi fantasy it's a bit different for this one seeing as its sorta supposed to reflect upon certain obvious political issues of our current time such as capitalism, climate change, easily manipulated governmental systems, non-renewable energy etc Cities that 'eat' and 'absorb' other cities which only benefits the few in the cities instead of everyone which would possibly lead to a better future.
This can be easily detected in the story but the sci-fi element is so zany with its wheeled warrior cities the social commentary kinda gets smothered.
Not to mention the sheer quantity of horrendous greenscreen effects and shots. So yeah, the wheeled tank-like cities concept is engaging but ultimately really stupid.
The rest of it is by the numbers science fiction which can be somewhat fun but only when the characters are actually onboard some kind of moving vehicle they aren't very good characters that's why.
Once they fall off onto the ground the movie literally stops dead, which is weird when you think about it. This is a highly imaginative and packed world for sure but as said before it owes so much to other films and tries to do too much.
I felt like I was watching the final movie in a trilogy or more! The movie really feels like it needs sequels but I doubt that will happen.
One thing I will say, I reckon this has future cult status written all over it. Phil H Super Reviewer.
Mar 12, There's way too much going on, either the movie should have jettisoned a subplot or two, or been a lot longer. That said, I still enjoyed the movie for its ambition and strange set-up.
The image of London as a ravenous machine bent on devouring other cities is kind of ingenious. Alec B Super Reviewer.
Feb 03, Shocking nobody, Mortal Engines was not very good. Trying to jam way too much into two hours than is reasonable, it instead delivers on zero things.
I guess I was kind of interested in the character of Shrike, but that was really the whole of my positive experience with Mortal Engines.
Maybe if this thing had come out about eight years ago in the height of the bizarre Steam Punk obsession that gripped the globe even if it was a weird sort of obsession where everybody called everything they like, and themselves Steam Punk but it really wasn't required to have any relation to actual Steam Punk then the movie could have at least done well financially, but there's no world wherein this version of Mortal Engines is a consumate film.
Gimly M Super Reviewer. See all Audience reviews. There are no approved quotes yet for this movie. Best Horror Movies. Worst Superhero Movies.
Best Netflix Series and Shows. Go back. More trailers. We Are Who We Are. Filthy Rich. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Theatrical release poster. Release date. Running time. Film Music Reporter. Archived from the original on Retrieved 18 June Variety Insight.
Retrieved The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved December 17, Retrieved December 11, Box Office Mojo. Retrieved June 12, Screen Rant.
Heart of London. Archived PDF from the original on The Dominion Post. Archived from the original on February 23, Retrieved October 25, Deadline Hollywood.
Retrieved June 11, June 7, July 17, Retrieved November 4, Retrieved 27 November Retrieved 20 March Retrieved October 8, Retrieved November 26, Deadline's Most Valuable Blockbuster Tournament".
Retrieved April 8, Retrieved December 16, Retrieved December 23, Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved March 22, The Guardian. Retrieved 11 December The Daily Telegraph.
Sydney Morning Herald. Hindustan Times. The New York Times. Retrieved 8 January Rolling Stone. Christian Rivers has done a fantastic job - a huge, visually awesome action movie with perfect pace and a genuine emotional core.
See it on the biggest screen you can. Retrieved December 6, — via Twitter.
Peter Jackson Mortal Engines Movies / TV Video
Hugo Weaving Reunites With Peter Jackson in 'Mortal Engines' - Collider Video Die Weltpremiere war am Simon Raby. Rivers lässt Abschlussfahrt Movie4k seinem Spielfilm-Regiedebüt dann auch keine Zweifel daran, was er besonders gut kann. Wird das Böse siegen? Der Terminator? Auch als Produzent stieg Jackson in die Godzilla 2 King Of The Monsters. Junkie XL.Peter Jackson Mortal Engines Related articles Video
Mortal Engines (2018) - Trailer With Peter Jackson and Christian Rivers Commentary Peter Jackson has confirmed that the Mortal Engines film is to get a sequel after all! It will be called Mortal Engines: Fool's Gold Which is a play. In Peter Jacksons Millionen-Dollar-Verfilmung des Steampunk-Romans "Mortal Engines" kämpft eine junge Heldin gegen eine. mortal engines 2. A mysterious young woman, Hester Shaw, emerges as the only one who can stop a giant, predator city on wheels devouring American Horror Story Coven in its path. Deborah Wolke Hegenbarth Kind. Edit Did You Know? Relics of 21st-century technology such as toasters, computers, and smartphones are valued by historians as "Old-Tech. It's that it seems so like other films released within the last years that it's easy to dismiss as derivative, but this is a wunderkind of originality. Even if Mortal Engines had managed a mediocre opening weekend in North America, it quickly would have a cinematic-universe behemoth like Aquaman and a franchise Wedding Peach Serien Stream like Bumblebee to face this week. But the man who helmed "Mortal Engines" is Christian Rivers, making his feature directing debut.